![winmerge visual studio winmerge visual studio](https://www.winosbite.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/winmerge.png)
If ((p = wcsrchr(szwThemeFile, L'\\')) = NULL) If (m_themeHelper.GetCurrentThemeName(szwThemeFile,ĪRRSIZE(szwThemeColor), NULL, 0) != S_OK) c:\emuleplus\dialogmintraybtn.hpp 445 WCHAR szwThemeFile Visual Studio: warning C6054: String 'szwThemeFile' might not be zero-terminated. The total number of messages generated by PVS-Studio is 68, 3 of them being real errors. The total number of messages generated by the Visual Studio static analyzer is 237, 4 of them being real errors. Here is a list of projects which participated in the research: Then we made the same steps with PVS-Studio. We looked through the whole message list and chose explicit errors. We checked five random open source projects with the static analyzer integrated into Visual Studio 2010 Premium. So we decided to carry out a practical experiment of error detection in real projects.
![winmerge visual studio winmerge visual studio](https://www.ndepend.com/Doc/VS_Diff/MenuDiff.png)
Of course, there is no sense in just calculating the number of errors. Still we cannot do without comparing tools by errors they can detect.
#WINMERGE VISUAL STUDIO CODE#
The article "Difficulties of comparing code analyzers, or don't forget about usability" tells that it is not so easy to compare two tools as it may seem because the parameter of usability is also highly significant besides the technical characteristics proper. Results of comparing these two tools are presented at the end of the article. The same projects were also checked with PVS-Studio. The research was performed on five open source projects.
![winmerge visual studio winmerge visual studio](https://community.gamedev.tv/uploads/db2322/original/3X/4/a/4a0c311e81794b087a905bfdf654bcb91aacfbb8.jpeg)
The article demonstrates errors detected with the static code analyzer integrated into Visual Studio 2010.